Making Decisions

The most important decision that we have to make is entrusting someone with a job.

Whether this someone that you want to entrust with a job is you or somebody else, whether your are making the decision or giving advice to the decisions maker, you are probably wondering: what are the factors to take into account before deciding that someone is a good fit?

A Job Analysis Framework

Convenient for making faster decision while evaluating candidates for a position.

What you can see in the table below is a framework for making a job analysis. It's a visual representation that helps see the actions that a role can make to deliver something.

Someone fits in the role if they developed the good quality for the role, they develop this good quality by following the true doctrine.

The deliverable they produce can either have a right or wrong attribute. Active countermeasures prevent the wrong attribute from being enabled and the passive countermeasures prevent the right attribute from being disabled. The External risk enables the wrong attribute and lead to external consequences. The Internal risk disables the right attribute and lead to internal consequences.

Consequences are unfortunate events. They are the reason why the deliverable exists.

Most roles produce one deliverable but some roles produce multiple deliverables. And some deliverables depend on multiple roles.

You will be more willing to entrust someone if they are capable of demonstrating that they know the consequences, they know the risks, they know the countermeasures and they know the right and wrong attributes of the deliverables that they have to produce.

External consequence
Internal consequence
External Risk
Internal Risk
Active Countermeasures
Passive Countermeasures
Wrong attribute
Right attribute
Deliverables
Actions
Role
Bad Quality
Good Quality
False Doctrine
True Doctrine

Below are a few examples to illustrate the usage of this framework


External consequence
Complaints
Internal consequence
Relocations
External Risk
Disturbances
Internal Risk
Intimidations
Active Countermeasures
Neighborhood watches
Passive Countermeasures
Proportionate responses
Wrong attribute
Offensive
Right attribute
Polite
Deliverables
Activities
Actions
Orientations
Role
Neighbors
Bad Quality
Loud
Good Quality
Quiet
False Doctrine
Tourism
True Doctrine
Localism

External consequence
News leaks
Internal consequence
Demolitions
External Risk
Defections
Internal Risk
Withdrawals
Active Countermeasures
Counter-intelligence Agencies
Passive Countermeasures
Embassy shelters
Wrong attribute
Careless
Right attribute
Diplomatic
Deliverables
Missions
Actions
Informations
Role
Foreigners
Bad Quality
Shifty
Good Quality
Trustworthy
False Doctrine
Particularism
True Doctrine
Universalism

External consequence
Enemies
Internal consequence
Casualties
External Risk
Threats
Internal Risk
Traps
Active Countermeasures
Special Forces
Passive Countermeasures
Sensors
Wrong attribute
Terrorist
Right attribute
Armed
Deliverables
Norms
Actions
Operations
Role
Public Administrations
Bad Quality
Merciless
Good Quality
Forgiving
False Doctrine
Militarism
True Doctrine
Pacifism

Popular posts from this blog

Predicting Outcomes

Growing Engagement

Learning Effectively